Language Assembler (PowerPC)
Date: | 08/25/05 |
Author: | Berthold Stöger |
URL: | n/a |
Comments: | 1 |
Info: | n/a |
Score: | (3.37 in 140 votes) |
# 99 bottles of beer in PowerPC-Assembler on Linux # Compile with "gcc -nostdlib -s bottle.s" # Tested with gcc version 3.3.5 on Linux 2.6.12 for PPC .section .rodata .align 1 .byte "0No more bottles of beer on the wall, no more bottles of beer." .byte '\n' .byte "Go to the store and buy some more, 99 bottles of beer on the wall." .byte '\n' .byte "0Take one down and pass it around, | bottle{ of beer on the wall." .byte '\n','\n' .byte "0| bottle{ of beer on the wall, | bottle{ of beer." .byte '\n' .s1: .byte "0no more" .nomore: .section .text .align 2 .globl _start _start: mr 15,1 # r15 = stack base subi 1,1,200 # make place for string li 16,99 # r16 = counter .l3: lis 2,.s1@ha la 2,.s1@l(2) bl .print subi 16,16,1 bl .print cmpwi 0,16,0 bne .l3 bl .print li 0,1 # SYS_exit li 3,0 # returncode = 0 sc # syscall .print: mr 4,15 .l1: lbzu 3,-1(2) cmpwi 0,3,'0' beq .l1_exit cmpwi 0,3,'{' blt .l1_char bgt .l1_count cmpwi 0,16,1 beq .l1 li 3,'s' stbu 3,-1(4) b .l1 .l1_count: cmpwi 0,16,0 bgt .l1_pos lis 5,.nomore@ha la 5,.nomore@l(5) .l2: lbzu 3,-1(5) cmpwi 0,3,'0' beq .l1 stbu 3,-1(4) b .l2 .l1_pos: li 6,10 divw 3,16,6 # Urgh. PPC doesn't supply mullw 6,3,6 # the remainder of divisions... sub 5,16,6 addi 5,5,'0' stbu 5,-1(4) cmpwi 0,3,0 ble .l1 addi 3,3,'0' stbu 3,-1(4) b .l1 .l1_char: stbu 3,-1(4) b .l1 .l1_exit: li 0,4 # SYS_write li 3,1 # fd = stdout sub 5,15,4 # len sc # syscall blr
Download Source | Write Comment
Download Source | Write Comment
Add Comment
Please provide a value for the fields Name,
Comment and Security Code.
This is a gravatar-friendly website.
E-mail addresses will never be shown.
Enter your e-mail address to use your gravatar.
Please don't post large portions of code here! Use the form to submit new examples or updates instead!
Comments
barrym said on 07/15/10 04:50:04
From an amateur's perspective, I prefer the look and feel of this source
over the "much more efficient" version. Am I being retardeD?