Language CADOL II
Date: | 07/28/06 |
Author: | David Weintraub |
URL: | http://www.weintraubworld.net |
Comments: | 6 |
Info: | n/a |
Score: | (2.44 in 43 votes) |
Cadol II was the language of the Cado Systems. It was a 2 KHz 8085A eight bit processor with either 32 or 48K of memory. Cado was a popular business system in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The early versions had 2 to 3 8" single sided floppies for storing data (576K per disk). Later versions had double sided floppies, and even a hard drive as large as 20 megabytes! They were all multiple user systems. The 32K model supported 2 users and the 48K model supported 4 users. # PROG #20 # # ####BUILD SCREEN # RESET ATT 6 SPACE 20 DISPLAY "BOTTLES OF BEER SONG" NL NL SPACE 10 ATT 0 #XX BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE WALL NL SPACE 10 ATT 0 #XX BOTTLES OF BEER NL 2 SPACE 10 ATT 0 #TAKE ONE DOWN AND PASS IT AROUND NL SPACE 10 ATT 0 #XX BOTTLES OF BEER # # ####INITIALIZE THE SONG BUFFER # N = 1 #INITIALIZE SONG GOSUB 21 # # ####NOW SING THE SONG # LET N10 = 99 #BOTTLES OF BEER 10 IF N10 = 0 GO TO 900 CLEAR # # ####XX BOTTLE(S) OF BEER ON THE WALL # LET N = 2 LET N1 = N10 GOSUB 21 DISPLAY A #XX BOTTLE(S) OF BEER SPACE STAY LET N = 3 #ON THE WALL GOSUB 21 DISPLAY A # # ####XX BOTTLE(S) OF BEER # LET N = 2 LET N1 = N10 GOSUB 21 DISPLAY A # # ####TAKE ONE DOWN AND PASS IT AROUND # LET N = 3 GOSUB 21 DISPLAY A # # ####XX BOTTLE(S) OF BEER # LET N10 = N10 - 1 #REMOVE ONE BOTTLE OF BEER LET N1 = N10 LET N = 2 GOSUB 21 LET N = 2 LET N1 = N10 #BOTTLES OF BEER GOSUB 21 DISPLAY A #BOTTLE OR BOTTLES OF BEER DELAY 2 GO TO 10 900 NOP #END OF PROGRAM LOAD 0 #BACK TO MENU END 20 # PROG #21 # # ####DECIDE WHETHER SINGULAR OR PLURAL BOTTLE # IF N = 1 GO TO 10 #LOAD THE X BUFFER IF N = 2 GO TO 20 #N1 BOTTLE(S) OF BEER IF N = 3 GO TO 30 #ON THE WALL IF N = 4 GO TO 40 #LOAD UP "TAKE ONE DOWN AND PASS IT AROUND GO TO 100 #OBVIOUSLY YOU MADE AN ERROR # # ####LOAD UP X BUFFER # 10 INIT XP X(A) = " BOTTLES OF BEER" X(A) = " BOTTLE OF BEER" X(A) = "ON THE WALL" X(A) = "TAKE ONE DOWN PASS IT AROUND" X(A) = "NO MORE" # # ####SINGLE OR PLURAL BOTTLE OF BEER # 20 IF N1 = 0 GO TO 22 #NO MORE BOTTLES INIT ZP SPOOL (2.0) N1 TO Z(A) #NUMBER OF BOTTLES OF BEER INIT XP IF N1 = 1 SKIP X(A) #SINGULAR BOTTLE OF BEER LET Z(A) = X(A) INIT ZP LET A = Z(A) RETURN 22 INIT XP #NO MORE BOTTLES OF BEER LET A = X(A) #BOTTLES OF BEER SKIP X(A) 3 #BOTTLE OF BEER...TAKE ONE DOWN INIT ZP SPOOL X(A) TO Z(A) #NO MORE LET Z(A) = A #BOTTLE OF BEER ON THE WALL INIT ZP LET A = Z(A) RETURN # # ####DISPLAY "ON THE WALL" # 30 INIT XP SKIP X(A) 2 #PLURAL AND SINGULAR BOTTLE(S) OF BEER A = X(A) #ON THE WALL RETURN 40 INIT XP SKIP X(A) 3 #BOTTLE OF BEER...ON THE WALL A = X(A) #TAKE ONE DOWN AND PASS IT AROUND RETURN # # ####ERROR # 100 A = "BAD FUNCTION SET IN <N> REGISTER" N = PROG LOAD 32 #ERROR DISPLAY END 21 How did they do this? Simple, they designed the machine to use a minimum amount of memory. There wasn't even a file system. Each disk had 72 tracks. Each track had 32 sectors. Each sector had 256 bytes. You specified where files were located by track and drive. If you weren't careful, you could overlay two files. We kept paper charts for each system mapping the files and program locations on the drives. Programs shared the same space as files. You had eight libraries per drive, and each library consisted of eight tracks. Each sector can hold one program which couldn't be more than 256 bytes. Otherwise, you had to go to another program in the library. Each library could have 256 programs. Library #0 took tracks 4 to 11. Library #2 took tracks 12 to 19. Library #3 took tracks 20 to 27, etc. The first four tracks (0 to 3) contained the basic OS. If you weren't careful, a file could overwrite your programs or maybe you put your programs on top of your files. Programs weren't compiled, but translated into an Intermediate Language (IL Code). Each command in Cadol was represented by a single IL byte. When the program was executed, the byte was doubled which was an entry into a memory table. That was a pointer to the assembly routine that executed the instructions. Instruction data followed the IL byte. For example, NL would move the cursor to the beginning of the line, and down to the next line. It was followed by a byte that explained how many new lines to display, so a NL command took up two bytes in IL. Text was expensive since each character took up a byte of IL code. Text strings were represented in an interesting fashion. The high byte was turned on except for the last character where it was turned off. This is how Cadol knew where the string ended. This becomes important when you program. There was not much in memory. You had 26 numeric registers (N through N25) which were six bytes long. Then you had 9 alpha registers (A, B, and C were 40 bytes long. A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2 were 20 bytes long). The registers were arranged in this order A, A1, A2, B, B1, B2, C, C1, C2. If you stored 80 bytes in A, then it would also use the storage in A1 and A2. The longest string you could store would be 180 bytes, and it would take up all 9 Alpha registers. All memory was global to all programs the user executed. Therefore, it was standard to use the A, N, N1, N2, N3, and N4 registers for GOSUB data and not to store any long term data in them. You also had 5 buffers of 255 bytes a piece. X, Y, and Z were general purpose buffers. The R buffer was the read buffer, and the W buffer was the write buffer. You had to be careful with the Z buffer because it was used by system routines, so storage was very temporary. Fortunately, records were variable lengths (because string storage was variable length), so if you knew that the records you were reading or writing were no more than 150 bytes, you could use the last 100 bytes of the R and W buffer for storage. You manipulated the buffers with SKIP and INIT statements. INIT would set the buffer pointer to the first byte of the buffer. SKIP X(A) 3 would skip 3 alpha fields in the X buffer. SKIP X(4) would skip four bytes in the X buffer. Every time you mentioned a buffer (Like "DISPLAY X(A)") you advanced the buffer pointer to the next field. The screen on the CADOL computer was 80 x 24 lines. RESET completely cleared the screen. Attributes (the ATT) command put attributes on the screen. ATT 0 started an unprotected field. ATT 2 was a protected field ATT 4 was half brightness. ATT 8 was flashing, etc. You added Attributes values to produce different things. For example, ATT 6 was half bright and protected. Every time you said "DISPLAY", it would go to the next unprotected field (unless you said STAY before the DISPLAY). CLEAR Cleared all unprotected fields, and move the cursor to the HOME position. Well, with this background, you should be able to read the little program I wrote in Cadol. By the way, this is two programs. Program #20 is the main program, and Program #21 contains some sub-routines for Program #20 because you only have 255 IL bytes per program, and you almost always ended up doing GOSUBs and LOADs to other programs. Program #32 is the standard error routine, and Program #0 was the main menu program.
Download Source | Write Comment
Download Source | Write Comment
Add Comment
Please provide a value for the fields Name,
Comment and Security Code.
This is a gravatar-friendly website.
E-mail addresses will never be shown.
Enter your e-mail address to use your gravatar.
Please don't post large portions of code here! Use the form to submit new examples or updates instead!
Comments
Corey Little said on 12/12/06 03:30:08
I'm having some trouble with this code... It works fine on my model 20, but the ATT statements aren't backwards compatible with my model 40... Any chance of a CADOL I rewrite? (ha ha) Seriously, very cool, I wonder how many other people still have a machine that will compile and run this? (And I can back-fit it to the 40 just fine
Bob said on 05/23/07 02:41:12
Been soooo long, let me see what I can remember..
Are you using the same terminal between the two systems? Different terminal models supported different subsets of control codes.
ATT statements are passed through a lookup table before sent to the terminal. Make sure you have the correct teminal type set on each machine (or was that just printer partitions? I forget).
I think CADOL was amazing in that each user partition had only 2k of memory. All the applications that ran on the Cado systems.. Very complex business programs could not trip those machines up.
The company I worked for ran a Tiger64 with 8 retail stores using a remote terminals (connected over a modem) as a register/invoicing system. In the home office, the rest of the ports where all taken via terminals or printers. It was amazingly versitile.
Alex said on 08/25/08 19:25:54
I still own a CAT-II with two ports and two 8" diskette drives but haven't powered it on since late 1980's. In early to mid 80's I wrote and tested thousands of lines of CADOL code for a company that specialized in manufacturing systems for the CADO.
Geoff said on 12/05/08 03:57:17
I work for a small community bank that uses a banking system called BANCADO. It is a very versatile system. We run it on an SCO unix system. Of course it is the Versyss runtime system that actually runs the CADOL code.
felipe fernandez said on 02/04/09 22:27:47
Gary Sloane said on 09/16/10 21:28:03
I used to program in Cadol on Cado systems (Cat /IV) at Chase Media in SLC, UT, and at Benchmark Computer Systems, in Waukesha, WI. Anyone got a Cado machine they'll let go? If so PLEASE contact me!!! gksloane--at--hotmail